
To be sure, there are ideological as well as economic reasons for mass incarceration and over-criminalization. For example, more than half ($13.6 billion) of the cost of running local jails is spent detaining people who have not been convicted. Local governments are largely enforcing state law, and local discretionary arrest and bail policies can have tremendous influence on both the state budget and justice outcomes. For example, while state government spending makes up the majority (57%) of corrections costs, local governments make up almost a third (32%). Sometimes these systems work together, although often they do not and looking at just the national picture can obscure the importance of state and local policy decisions. Instead, we have a federal system, 50 state systems, and thousands of local government systems.
Commissary vendors that sell goods to incarcerated people - who rely largely on money sent by loved ones - is an even larger industry that brings in $1.6 billion a year.Ī graphic like this shows the relative economic cost of different parts of mass incarceration, but it can also obscure the fact that we don’t have a single monolithic system. Specialized phone companies that win monopoly contracts and charge families up to $24.95 for a 15-minute phone call. The industry also actively works to block reforms that threaten its profits, even if reforms could prevent people from being detained in jail because of their poverty.
Bail bond companies that collect $1.4 billion in nonrefundable fees from defendants and their families. Some of the lesser-known major players in the system of mass incarceration and over-criminalization are: But, by following the money, one can see that private prison corporations aren’t the only ones who benefit from mass incarceration. We have no doubt that we missed some costs, and we did not include some costs because they are relatively small in the big picture or are currently unknowable. This report and infographic are a first step toward better understanding who benefits from mass incarceration and who might be resistant to reform. Feeding and providing health care for 2.3 million people - a population larger than that of 15 different states 3 - is expensive. Private companies that supply goods to the prison commissary or provide telephone service for correctional facilities bring in almost as much money ($2.9 billion) as governments pay private companies ($3.9 billion) to operate private prisons. And over the last decade, states have been reducing this figure even as caseloads have grown. Despite the fact that the Constitution requires counsel to be appointed for defendants unable to afford legal representation, the system only spends $4.5 billion on this right. The government payroll for corrections employees is over 100 times higher than the private prison industry’s profits. The criminal justice system is overwhelmingly a public system, with private prison companies acting only as extensions of the public system. This group is an influential lobby that sometimes prevents reform and whose influence is often protected even when prison populations drop. Almost half of the money spent on running the correctional system goes to paying staff. Our visualization shows how wide and how deep mass incarceration and over-criminalization have spread into our economy.
Our goal with this report is to give a hint as to how the criminal justice system works by identifying some of the key stakeholders and quantifying their “stake” in the status quo.
we share all of our sources so that journalists and advocates can build upon our work.
we highlight some of the under-discussed yet costly parts of the system, and then. we give the relative importance of the various parts,. we provide the significant 1 costs of our globally unprecedented system of mass incarceration and over-criminalization,. In this first-of-its-kind report, we find that the system of mass incarceration costs the government and families of justice-involved people at least $182 billion every year. But prisons and jails are just one piece of the criminal justice system and the amount of media and policy attention that the various players get is not necessarily proportional to their influence. The cost of imprisonment - including who benefits and who pays - is a major part of the national discussion around criminal justice policy. Following the Money of Mass Incarcerationīy Peter Wagner and Bernadette Rabuy Tweet this